Sunday, October 30, 2016

World Series 2016: Cooler weather awaits players, fans at Wrigley Field

By , Senior Meteorologist
October 30,2016; 2:14PM,EDT
 
 
Game 5 will bring the coolest conditions players and fans of the World Series have had to face at Wrigley Field.
The Cleveland Indians took a 3-1 lead over the Chicago Cubs after winning Game 4 on another fairly mild evening Saturday night. Even though clouds were overhead, the rain remained well off to the north and west during the game.
Game 5 at Wrigley Field will determine whether a champion is crowned in Chicago or if the series returns to Cleveland on Tuesday.
The first pitch for Game 5 is slated for 7:15 p.m. CDT on Sunday evening.
Game 5
Rain gear will not be needed for Game 5 as any rain starting on Sunday will depart Chicago by the midday hours.
High pressure will then build overhead for the evening hours, promoting dry weather and continuing to usher in seasonably cooler air.

"Of the three World Series games at Wrigley Field, Sunday night's game will feature the coolest conditions," said AccuWeather Meteorologist Mike Doll.
However, temperatures will still be 10 degrees Fahrenheit higher than the chill both teams experienced during Game 2, when a first pitch temperature of 43 F was recorded.
Fans will not want to leave their jackets at home or in hotel rooms as temperatures should slowly fall through the lower 50s underneath a partly cloudy sky.

A slight wind will hold AccuWeather RealFeel® Temperatures to the upper 40s.
The winds will once again favor the pitchers over the batters on Sunday evening, according to Doll. "Winds will blow in from right field at 6-12 mph."
Cleveland weather outlook
If Chicago wins Game 5 and the series returns to Cleveland, mild weather awaits fans and players at Progressive Field.
RELATED:
Interactive north-central US radar
AccuWeather MinuteCast® for Chicago
AccuWeather winter forecast: Bitter cold to grip the northern Plains, Midwest

Warmer air will surge back into northern Ohio for the first two days of November. Temperatures will rise 10-15 degrees above normal to afternoon highs in the middle 70s.
Temperatures each evening of Tuesday and Wednesday are expected to be in the 60s with the prospect of rain low.
A south to southwest wind ushering in the mild air would help to carry any fly balls deeper into the outfield or the stands.

November Outlook: Mild Temperatures Expected For Much of U.S.

Linda Lam
Published: October 28,2016

November weather conditions in the U.S. will likely be similar to what we have experienced in October, but that may change later in the month, according to the latest November outlook issued by The Weather Company, an IBM business.
Much of the central and eastern U.S. will continue to find above-average temperatures due to a dominant upper-level ridge of high pressure.
The areas which are expected to see temperatures the highest above average include the northern Plains, the Midwest and the northern Rockies. Parts of the South, East and along the West coast, however, are forecast to see temperatures close to average for this time of year.
(MORE: Winter 2016-17 Outlook)
November temperature outlook from The Weather Company, an IBM Business.
"The unusually strong Pacific jet will likely persist during at least the first half of November, resulting in a flood of very mild air across much of the U.S.," according to Dr. Todd Crawford, chief meteorologist with The Weather Company.
However, a pattern change may set in later in the month.
An upper-level ridge of high pressure is expected to develop over the West in mid-November. As the upper-level ridge builds, a southward dip in the jet stream, or upper-level trough, will develop over the East.
Therefore, blasts of colder temperatures in the East will be more likely later in the month. This will also allow the warmer-than-average temperatures to slide westward.
(MAPS: Extended Forecast)

November Precipitation Outlook

This pattern is also expected to keep a swath of the West Coast, from Washington and Oregon to northern California, wetter than average in November. This is good news for the multi-year Western drought.
(MAPS: Precipitation Forecast)
November precipitation outlook from The Weather Company, an IBM Business.
Otherwise, the jet stream is expected to keep the storm track closer to the Canadian border in the rest of the country, which will make for drier-than-average conditions in the southern tier of the U.S.
This is not good news for the increasingly dire drought in the Deep South, Tennessee Valley and southern Appalachians.
MORE: Northeast Snow October 2016 (PHOTOS)

Shifting, Weakening Polar Vortex Could Mean More Cold Spells Ahead for North America, Study Says

Brian Donegan
Published: October 28,2016

The position of the polar vortex has shifted over the last several decades, and that could mean more cold spells for some mid-latitude locations, including North America, according to a newly-published study.
The study published October 24 in the journal Nature, led by Dr. Jiankai Zhang and Dr. Wenshou Tian, found that over the last three decades the polar vortex in February has moved toward Europe and Asia. That means bitter-cold days could become more common in February and March – bad news for spring lovers.
This shift in the position of the polar vortex is likely related to Arctic sea-ice loss, but also may be the result of increased snow cover in the Eurasian continent, the study said.
The polar vortex is an area of low pressure in the upper atmosphere, primarily in the stratosphere, a layer of the atmosphere above which most of our sensible weather occurs (known as the troposphere).
(MORE: What is the Polar Vortex?)
The polar vortex is strongest in winter, thanks to an increased temperature contrast between the polar regions and the mid-latitudes, including the United States.
When the polar vortex is strongest, you're less likely to see cold air plunge deep into North America or Europe. Occasionally, though, the polar vortex is disrupted and weakens. This happens when the stratosphere warms.
When the polar vortex is weakened, a piece of the polar vortex can surge farther south, helping to push Arctic cold into portions of North America and Europe.
Example of a weakened and elongated polar vortex due to stratospheric warming over Alaska and northeast Siberia.
Based on the results of the Zhang and Tian study, the most likely timeframe for a prolonged Arctic-air outbreak in North America is late winter into early spring as the polar vortex shifts toward Europe. We experienced this in the United States in 2014, 2015, and 2016.
(MORE: When the First Snow of the Season Typically Falls)
Noted climatologist and winter seasonal forecast expert, Dr. Judah Cohen of Atmospheric and Environment Research (AER), told weather.com, "We have shown that increased Eurasian snow cover and decreased Arctic sea ice have forced a weakening in the polar vortex, which is consistent with their findings."
Although numerous warm-temperature records have been set in North America and Europe over the past several years, the researchers in the study found that the cold air being displaced into the mid-latitudes by the polar vortex has been able to offset some of the record-warm temperatures.
"Winter has been the most resilient season to climate change, which is the exact opposite of our expectations. I would attribute much of the severe winter weather that we have experienced over the past two decades to increasing fall snow cover and decreasing fall Arctic sea ice," Cohen said.
(MORE: Winter 2016-17 Outlook)
The Zhang and Tian study also supports using snow cover and sea ice in seasonal forecasts.
Currently, there is high snow cover over Eurasia, according to the Rutgers Global Snow Lab, and low sea ice in the Arctic, and Cohen says that could lead to more weakening of the polar vortex in the coming months, potentially leading to more severe winter weather.

4 Years After Superstorm Sandy, Some Towns Still Wrestle With Consequences of the Storm

Associated Press
Published: October 28,2016

Along the New York and New Jersey coastlines, residents have worked for four years to remove the deep scars left behind by the devastation of Superstorm Sandy, which came ashore on Oct. 29, 2012.
But in areas like Oakwood Beach, which suffered irreversible damage from the storm, recovery will never be possible.
Built on a salt marsh, the Staten Island neighborhood is slowly being returned to nature after New York officials realized how pointless it would be to rebuild homes that have virtually no protection from the ocean.
Under a state buyout program, 196 homes have been demolished. Another 103 will soon meet the same fate.
A few residents remain. But on one recent visit, there was no one on the streets, no children playing and few cars going by. Many of the houses still standing are boarded up and plastered with signs that say "no trespassing."
"We're going to stay here as long as we can," said Connie Martinez, 61. "My husband is a very sick man. He had a stroke. He loves his yard. He loves his garden."
(MORE: Superstorm Sandy – a Daily Diary)
Police stand guard near beach homes that were damaged by Superstorm Sandy on Nov. 25, 2012 in Ortley Beach, New Jersey.
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)



































Yet, a buyout may still be in her future, said Martinez, who had three neighbors drown during the storm.
"The consensus of all my neighbors is they never should have built houses here," she said. "It should have been left wetlands."
Changes have come to other parts of the coastline, some big, some literally hidden in the sand.
In Mantoloking, New Jersey, a shore town that saw nearly all of its 521 homes damaged or destroyed, a huge steel wall has been erected on the beach and then buried, in most places, under man-made dunes to keep the surf from reaching oceanfront homes during future storms.
In Seaside Heights, made infamous by the MTV reality show "Jersey Shore," authorities still plan to rebuild an amusement park that had its roller coaster swept into the surf by the storm. But the town gave up on returning the park to a pier that jutted out into the water, opting instead for a new location on the beach.
(PHOTOS: A Look Back at Sandy's Epic Devastation)
The barrier island city of Long Beach, New York, had its only full-service hospital destroyed by flooding. The medical center was replaced last year by a smaller emergency department operated by an off-island community hospital.
But after four years of rebuilding, few places have as stark a then-and-now look as Oakwood Beach.
Not even the foundations remain of the seven homes that once stood on either side of Martinez's house. All that's there now are empty patches of green grass, which the state is still paying to have mown until the last residents leave.
Signs of former life can still be glimpsed here and there: exterior Christmas lights on one house, a children's playset and collapsed trampoline at another. But they're marked for demolition with splashes of red paint.
A roller coaster sits in the ocean after the Casino Pier collapsed when Superstorm Sandy hit, on Nov. 25,2012 in Seaside Heights, New Jersey.
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
"As soon as there's a buyout, they automatically throw up the boards, put the locks on the doors so there's no trespassing and intruders," said Joe Giordano, an engineer with NorthStar, the state contractor overseeing the demolition. "All those that are boarded up will come down in the next year to year and a half."
In the northernmost section of the neighborhood, where damage was less severe, homes have been restored and life goes on. Resident Leonard Desisto, a retired city bus operator, said the neighborhood's state now reminds him of when he bought his house in 1982, when it wasn't as built-up.
"It's peaceful again," he said. "To tell the truth, I like it better."
Changes on other parts of the coastline are more difficult to see, unless you know what it was like before the storm.
On Fire Island, a popular summertime vacation spot, Sandy's storm surge blasted clean through the narrow strip of land and left a new permanent inlet, between 1,475 and 2,345 feet across.
The breach between the Atlantic Ocean and the Great South Bay initially raised concerns about flooding on Long Island's south shore. Experts say that hasn't happened, and now officials at the National Park Service are examining whether to leave the new waterway open.
(WATCH: Art From Superstorm Sandy Debris)
One argument in favor of doing so: The hole has helped flush pollution out of the bay, leading to a resurgence of clams and bass, according to Charles Flagg, a marine science professor at Stony Brook University.
At the sandy, wind-swept tip of New York City's Rockaway peninsula, the beachfront enclave of Breezy Point has made a remarkable recovery. More than 300 homes destroyed by flooding and a raging fire have been rebuilt.
But many of the new houses have a different look. Once a community of low bungalows, its new houses stand on concrete pillars or ultra-high foundations. A few have been rebuilt entirely of concrete, rather than wood, to better withstand pounding surf.
Arthur Lighthall, general manager of the Breezy Point Cooperative, said some residents now have to climb a dozen steps to reach decks that formerly sat right on the sand. Besides being taller, the new houses are shielded from the ocean by a new wall of protective dunes.
Former U.S. Rep. Bob Turner, a Breezy Point resident, said one important thing hasn't changed by a storm that left much of the community a charred ruin.
"The people are the same," he said. "There was some dislocation but not widespread."

25 Years Ago: A Perfect Storm, an Unnamed Hurricane, and a Historic Halloween Midwest Blizzard

Jon Erdman
Published: October 29,2016

Twenty-five years ago, a pair of historic storms lashed the East Coast and upper Midwest, one of which was so meteorologically spectacular it earned the name "The Perfect Storm," becoming a part of pop culture after the June 2000 movie release of the drama/thriller with the same name.
What made the storm off the East Coast "perfect," as described by the National Weather Service, was a perfect confluence of factors, including a strengthening non-tropical low off Atlantic Canada, a former hurricane, strong high pressure over eastern Canada and the eastern U.S., then a bizarre transition to another hurricane.

Infrared satellite image of the "Perfect Storm" when it reached its peak intensity on the morning of Wednesday, Oct. 30, 1991.

The Atlantic Low

After a strong cold front swept off the East Coast, an area of low pressure developed on Oct. 28, 1991 east of Nova Scotia, quickly intensifying into the following day.
As it did so, a strong area of high pressure was burgeoning over eastern Canada, producing a tremendous pressure gradient between the high and the lowering pressure of the gale center. The stronger the pressure gradient, the more fierce the winds.
Surface analysis for Oct. 30, 1991. A tightening pressure gradient between the mature storm system (surface pressure of roughly 972 millibars) and an area of high pressure stretched out from the Carolinas northward to far eastern Canada. The "Perfect Storm" reached its peak intensity on this day producing ferocious northeasterly winds across coastal New England and battering the shoreline with tremendous wave action. Source: hpc.ncep.noaa.gov
Winds already increased to tropical storm-force near the center of the storm and along the New England coast of the United States.
According to the best-selling novel "The Perfect Storm" by Sebastian Junger, it was during this intensification phase of the low that presumably sunk the fishing boat "Andrea Gail" on Oct. 28.
Then it got even more meteorologically complex.

Ingesting a Hurricane Remnant





























On Oct. 29, the large non-tropical low near Nova Scotia began to absorb Hurricane Grace, wrapping in its tropical moisture and likely receiving an injection of energy.
You can see the evolution of this development in this YouTube video clip with Stu Ostro’s analysis from The Weather Channel’s coverage of the storm.
Visible satellite image of the Perfect Storm ingesting the remnant of what was once Hurricane Grace on October, 29, 1991, at 11:01 a.m. ET.

Grace was whipped quickly just south of Bermuda, then was caught up in the eastern side of the massive "Perfect Storm's" circulation.On the morning of Wednesday, Oct. 30, the storm reached its peak intensity as the pressure lowered to an estimated 972 millibars. As it peaked in strength, the storm then began to drift southwest toward the New England coast on Oct. 30 and 31.
The sun rises over the fisherman's statue June 21, 2000 in Gloucester, Massachusetts. The 2000 movie ''The Perfect Storm'' is based on the lives of six Gloucester fisherman who lost their lives in the 1991 storm.
(Darren McCollester/Newsmakers)

Impact

High winds lashed the New England coast on Oct. 30 and 31, with peak Massachusetts gusts of 78 mph at Chatham, 74 mph at Thatcher Island and 68 mph at Marblehead, and 63 mph at Newport, Rhode Island.
These high winds whipped up pounding surf caused by the long overwater fetch length and duration of the Perfect Storm, leading to coastal flooding and damage.
Waves 10 to 30 feet high were observed from the Canadian Maritimes to North Carolina's Outer Banks. Tides reached levels not seen in 47 years in New Jersey and, in some parts of the Delmarva Peninsula, eclipsed those seen during the infamous Ash Wednesday storm of March 1962.
Damage at the coast was extensive.
"Hundreds of homes and businesses were either knocked from their foundations or simply disappeared. Sea walls, boardwalks, bulkheads and piers were reduced to rubble over a wide area. Numerous small boats were sunk at their berths and thousands of lobster traps were destroyed. Flooding was extensive, invading homes and closing roads and airports."  - NOAA/NCEI Report on the Perfect Storm
The damage in Massachusetts was described as the worst since the infamous Blizzard of '78.
The evolution of the Perfect Storm didn't end there.

The 'Unnamed Hurricane'

This is where it got weird.
As the overall storm began to weaken after lashing the East Coast as far south as North Carolina, a tiny circulation within the storm intensified into a full-fledged hurricane on Nov. 1, 1991.
(MORE: The 35 Strangest Weather Events I've Seen in My Lifetime)
Satellite images taken 24 hours apart on Oct. 31 and Nov. 1, 1991 showing the "Perfect Storm" morphing into the "Unnamed Hurricane."
























The U.S. Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunters even took flight into this hurricane, measuring maximum flight-level winds of 99 mph a few thousand feet above the ocean.
This hurricane was never named, for fear of alarming and confusing the public after the hard hit from the Perfect Storm. The so-called "Unnamed Hurricane" remained well out to sea and only limped ashore as a weakening tropical storm in Nova Scotia the next day.

The Halloween Blizzard of 1991

As the Perfect Storm was morphing into an unnamed hurricane, a blizzard of historic proportions was raging over parts of the upper Midwest.
The path of this early-season winter storm was pretty remarkable. With the Perfect Storm acting as an atmospheric block on the East Coast, a track from west to east was a no-go. There was only one way to go.
The storm developed over the far western Gulf of Mexico on Oct. 30, strengthening and tracking north-northeast toward Minnesota and Wisconsin on Halloween and Nov. 1.












































Its connection with the Gulf of Mexico allowed for plentiful available moisture, resulting in historic snow totals for this part of the upper Midwest.
The Halloween Blizzard set the largest single-storm snowfall record for the city of Minneapolis, dropping more than 2 feet of snow (28.4 inches).

Snow totals across the state of Minnesota from October 31 through November 3, 1991. Blue colors indicate 8 to 20 inches of snow. Purple indicates 20 to 32 inches of snow. Parts of the Arrowhead (white colors) picked up 32 inches or more.

In Duluth, Minnesota, the 36.9 inches of snow that fell was the largest amount on record for the state, surpassing all snow totals from a single storm during any of the winter months. This record was later eclipsed by a lake-effect snowstorm on Jan. 6-8, 1994 when 47 inches fell over Finland in Lake County.
Snow fell for 72 consecutive hours in Duluth, and winds gusting from 30 to 50 mph created blizzard conditions in outlying areas and whipped the heavy snow into huge drifts, burying vehicles and crippling travel.
Farther south, with warmer air nosing in just above the ground, a major ice storm unfolded. Southern Minnesota and Iowa felt it the worst.
According to the National Weather Service in La Crosse, Wisconsin, 1 to 2 inches of ice accumulated from southwest Iowa into north-central Iowa, and 2 to 3 inches of ice accumulated across south-central and southeast Minnesota.
The Halloween 1991 Blizzard was one of only four Category 5 winter storms of record in the Upper Midwest, as categorized by the Regional Snowfall Index.
(MORE: Ranking the Most Extreme U.S. Winter Storms)
The surreal satellite image taken on Nov. 1, 1991, showing both the Unnamed Hurricane in the western Atlantic Ocean and the Halloween blizzard in the Upper Midwest remains a favorite of meteorologists to this day.
(IMAGES: The Most Iconic Hurricane Images of All Time)
Visible satellite image of the "Unnamed Hurricane" capping off the "Perfect Storm" off the New England coast, and the Halloween Blizzard in the Upper Midwest (far left of the image) on Nov. 1, 1991, at 11:01 a.m. ET.
(NOAA)
Jonathan Erdman is a senior meteorologist at weather.com and has been an incurable weather geek since a tornado narrowly missed his childhood home in Wisconsin at age 7.

Hurricane Sandy: Four Years Later, A Meteorological Memoir

Jonathan Belles
Published: October 30,2016

It has now been more than four years since Hurricane Sandy roared to the coasts of Jamaica, Cuba, the Bahamas, and the United States.
(MORE: Some Towns Still Wrestling With Consequences from Superstorm Sandy)
Here's a look back at the meteorological history of Hurricane Sandy:

Notable Stats:

  • Highest Storm Surge: 12.65 feet at King's Point, New York
  • Most Inundation: 9.56 feet at Bergen Point West Reach, New York
  • Maximum Sustained Winds: 115 mph (near Cuba on Oct. 25)
  • Minimum Central Pressure: 940 mb (near the New Jersey coast on Oct. 29)
  • Most Rainfall (U.S.): 12.83 inches in Bellevue, Maryland
  • Most Snowfall: 36 inches near Richwood, West Virginia and on Wolf Laurel Mountain, North Carolina
  • Tornadoes: 1 F-0 tornado in Somerset, Bermuda

Meteorological History:

Hurricane Sandy, although known for its impacts along the Eastern Seaboard, attained peak strength in the Caribbean as a Category 3 Hurricane near Cuba early on October 25, 2012 with maximum sustained winds of 115 mph.
Track history for Hurricane Sandy






























Sandy developed in the southwestern Caribbean Sea on Oct. 22, 2012 from a pre-existing African Easterly Wave (or tropical wave).
After a small counter-clockwise loop, a southward dip in the jet stream picked Sandy up and brought it northward toward Jamaica and Cuba. Intensifying as it gained latitude, Sandy quickly became a hurricane and for a short time gained Category 3 status just west of Guantanamo Bay and Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
Left: Satellite image from early in the morning on October 25, 2012 as Sandy made landfall in Cuba. (Credit: NASA) Right: Caribbean track history for Hurricane Sandy







































Although Sandy's center only spent five hours crossing Cuba, it would never have maximum sustained wind speeds over 100 mph again. Higher wind shear caused Sandy to gradually weaken as the hurricane moved northwestward through the Bahamas.
The tropical storm force wind field doubled in size in just under 48 hours as Sandy moved north of the Bahamas, a transition that had had ramifications for the rest of its life. Specifically, the growing wind field contributed to the damaging storm surge that would be seen in the Northeast.
An anomalous atmospheric road block located in the North Atlantic forced Sandy to then turn toward the northwest on a path towards the Northeast U.S. coastline.
Sandy strengthened again as it closed in on the Northeast, with maximum sustained wind speeds reaching 100 mph more than 200 miles southeast of Atlantic City, New Jersey, on Oct. 29.
Just prior to landfall, Sandy's tropical storm force wind field grew to at least 870 miles in diameter, a record size for a tropical cyclone dating back to at least 1988, and likely beyond.
(COMPARE: Sandy and Hermine Size)
Cooler water closer to shore created a weakening trend on approach to the Jersey shore. As Sandy approached the coast, cooler air wrapped around the western side of the circulation, causing snowy conditions over the central Appalachians. Snow in itself is rare in hurricanes, but this was just the beginning of a second transition.
Track history for Sandy, tropical (red/orange) and post-tropical portions included (yellow)


































Just before making landfall on the New Jersey coast, observations pointed that this transition to "Post-Tropical Cyclone" had become final.
In essence, Sandy's core cooled, and its energy was being drawn more from aloft than from the ocean. Impacts along the coast and points inland remained unchanged, and Sandy began to weaken after landfall. Sandy crossed southern and western Pennsylvania and the circulation became ill-defined over northeastern Ohio.
Sandy gave up the ghost on Halloween in eastern Canada with one heck of a story to tell.

Sandy Rule

Following Sandy's untimely transition from hurricane to post-tropical just prior to landfall, lessons learned from confusion in the media and general public led the National Hurricane Center (NHC) to change some of their practices. This important new precedent based on a meteorological transition became known as the "Sandy Rule."
The Sandy Rule allows the NHC to retain control of tropical watches and warnings and allows the NHC to continue to forecast the future track and intensity of the post-tropical storm or hurricane.
This rule was notably invoked in Hurricanes Arthur of 2014 and Hermine of 2016.
MORE: Hurricane Sandy

World Series Forecast: How Much Will Weather Be a Factor?

Jon Erdman
Published: October 30,2016

A surreal 2016 World Series features two cold-climate cities starving for their first baseball championship since the early 20th century.
Here's a look at the forecast for Sunday night in Chicago, followed by what we can expect in Cleveland Tuesday if the World Series shifts back there.

Game 5: Mild, By Chicago Standards

Fortunately, for those who hope weather won't screw up sports championships, there are no major storm systems brewing for the Upper Midwest that could sink Sunday night's Game 5 at Chicago's Wrigley Field.
Sunday's first pitch will feature a temperature of about 50 degrees with the wind blowing in off of Lake Michigan at 5-10 mph. No rain is expected.
(FORECAST: Chicago)
Forecast for Game 5 of the World Series. Game to be played in Chicago.
The only World Series game in league history to be suspended due to rain was Game 5 of the 2008 World Series between the Tampa Bay Rays and Philadelphia Phillies, when the combination of rain and wind in Philadelphia forced the Oct. 27 game to be completed two days later.
Coincidentally, current Cubs manager Joe Maddon was skipper of the Rays in that series eight years ago.
The last World Series games played in Wrigley Field featured daytime highs ranging from 51 degrees on Oct. 8, 1945, to a balmy 74 degrees on Oct. 7, 1945.

Games 6 and 7 Outlook: November Warmth in Cleveland

If this best-of-seven game series needs Games 6 and 7 in Cleveland Tuesday and Wednesday, the weather looks good as well.
Initial forecast guidance suggests that a cold front will be pushing through the western Great Lakes, but will not have enough energy to push through northern Ohio, keeping Cleveland very mild for early November.
The forecast calls for southerly winds and evening (game-time) temperatures in the upper 60s. Winds could play a role in Game 6 Tuesday night.
Forecast weather conditions for first pitch of Game 6 around 8 p.m. EDT Tuesday.
There could be some rain in the picture by late Wednesday in Cleveland as the front stalls. It would remain mild as well with temperatures in the 60s during the evening.
(FORECAST: Cleveland)
Incidentally, the coldest World Series game of the last 40 years was on Oct. 22, 1997, in Cleveland, with a game-time temperature of 38 degrees, wind chills in the upper teens and flurries falling during the game.
It remains too soon to tell if that sluggish front will push close enough to the Cleveland metro this week to spawn any showers.
Check back with us at weather.com for the latest updates on the World Series weather forecast.

MORE: 50 Places For Fall Colors

Experts Say Aftershock is Possible After Massive 6.6 Magnitude Quake Struck Italy

October 30,2016
After central Italy was rocked by a 6.6 magnitude earthquake Sunday morning, experts say they can't exclude the possibility that there will be more, possibly stronger aftershocks in the area near Norcia .
British Geological Survey seismologist Margarita Segou told the Associated Press that the important thing to realize is that, while the number of temblors will decline over time, "we cannot  exclude the possibility of larger magnitude aftershocks.
She cited other regions such as Japan, which saw a series of quakes earlier this year that followed a similar pattern in which a quake is followed by a larger aftershock.
(MORE: Two Faults 'Holding Hands' Could Unleash Huge California Quake)
The USGS says the quake was centered about 4 miles north of Norica, Italy, and hit at 7:40 a.m. local time. Last Wednesday's 6.1 and 5.5 magnitude earthquakes were also centered in this same general area, along with many aftershocks in the following days.
There were no immediate reports of deaths, but about 20 people had suffered injuries as numerous buildings that had resisted the previous temblors collapsed.
Prime Minister Matteo Renzi said the nation's "soul is disturbed" by the series of quakes that began with the deadly Aug. 24 quake that killed almost 300 people.
He has vowed that the country will rebuild the homes, churches and other structures destroyed by the temblor, which is the latest to strike the region since Wednesday.
"We will rebuild everything - the houses, the churches, the shops," said Renzi. "We are dealing with marvelous territories, territories of beauty."
Residents already rattled by a constant trembling of the earth rushed into piazzas and streets after being roused from bed by the 7:40 a.m. quake.
Many people still had been sleeping in cars or evacuated to shelters or hotels in other areas after a pair of strong jolts on Wednesday. Curcio said 1,300 had been evacuated to the coast, and more would follow.
Rubble of a collapsed building in L'Aquila, central Italy, after an earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 6.6 struck central Italy, Sunday, Oct. 30, 2016. A powerful earthquake rocked the same area of central and southern Italy hit by quake in August and a pair of aftershocks last week, sending already quake-damaged buildings crumbling after a week of temblors that have left thousands homeless. (Alberto Orsini/ANSA via AP)






































The quake struck a cluster of mountain towns, many of historic significance, already reeling from last week's pair of aftershocks to an August earthquake that killed nearly 300: Norcia, Visso, Castelsantangelo sul Nero and Preci.
The head of the civil protection authority in Italy's Marche region, Cesare Spuri, said there were reports of buildings collapsing in many cities.
"We are trying to understand if people are under the rubble," Spuri said.
In the ancient city of Norcia, famed for its Benedictine monastery and its cured meats, witnesses said the 14th century St. Benedict cathedral crumbled, leaving only its facade standing.
Television images in the minutes after the quake showed nuns rushing out of their church and into Norcia's main piazza as the clock tower appeared ready to fall. One nun had to be carried by firefighters, while another was supported as she walked. Later, priests and nuns prayed in the square amid the rubble.
"It's as if the whole city fell down," Norcia city assessor Giuseppina Perla told the ANSA news agency.
The town closest to the quake's epicenter, Norcia is the birthplace of St. Benedict, the father of monasticism and has suffered a series of earthquakes over its history. The cathedral was built over Benedict's birthplace.
The monks of Norcia confirmed the collapse of the St. Benedict cathedral in a letter launching an immediate fundraising campaign to rebuild.
The current superior, who signed the letter to supporters as the Rev. Benedict, reported the cathedral was "flattened," and that monks were combing the city to help where needed.
"May this image serve to illustrate the power of this earthquake, and the urgency we monks feel to seek out those who need the sacraments on this difficult day for Italy," he wrote.
The deputy mayor of Norcia, Pierluigi Altavilla, said his house remained standing, but everything inside had been toppled.
"It seemed like a bomb exploded inside the house," he told Sky TG24.
The hilltop town of Camerino, some 60 kilometers from Ancona, suffered new building collapses but no reports of injuries. City spokesman Emmanuele Pironi said the main fire hall had been rendered uninhabitable and that they had transferred to a warehouse.
"An hour and a half after the quake, we can be reassured," Pironi told The Associated Press.
Pironi said most of the area's 9,000 university students had left after the town's historic center was closed due to danger of collapses last week, and some of the 7,000 residents had been moved to hotels near the coast or to shelters nearby. Few remained in their homes.
The mayor of quake-hit Ussita said a huge cloud of smoke erupted from the crumbled buildings.
"It's a disaster, a disaster!" Mayor Marco Rinaldi told ANSA. "I was sleeping in the car and I saw hell."
In Arquata del Tronto, which had been devastated by the Aug. 24 earthquake that killed nearly 300 people, Arquata Mayor Aleandro Petrucci said, "There are no towns left."
"Everything came down," he said.
New collapses also were reported in Tolentino, where the news agency ANSA said three people were extracted from the rubble.
The quake was felt throughout the Italian peninsula, with reports as far north as Bolzano near the Austrian border and as far south as Bari in the Puglia region. Residents rushed into the streets in Rome, where ancient palazzi shook, swayed and lurched for a prolonged spell.
Austria's governmental earthquake monitoring organization said the quake was felt to varying degrees in the east and south of the country and all the way to the city of Salzburg. It says that at its strongest, residents in upper floors noticed a swaying sensation and a slow swinging of hanging objects.
The quake sent boulders raining onto state highways and smaller roads, forcing closures throughout the quake zone that was impeding access to hard-hit cities such as Norcia. Traffic was being diverted to other roads.
The Salaria highway, one of the main highways in the region, was closed at certain points as it was after Wednesday's quakes.
In addition, Italy's rail line said some local lines in Umbria and Le Marche were closed as a precaution.
The European-Mediterranean Seismological Center put the magnitude at 6.6 or 6.5 with an epicenter 132 kilometers northeast of Rome and 67 kilometers east of Perugia, near the epicenter of last week's temblors. The U.S. Geological Survey put the magnitude at 6.6.
The German Research Centre for Geosciences put the magnitude at 6.5 and said it had a depth of 10 kilometers, a relatively shallow quake near the surface but in the norm for the quake-prone Apennine Mountain region.

Days of Record Warmth Close Out October, Open November in Central and Southern U.S.

Chris Dolce
Published: October 30,2016

Summer will continue to lag into early November, with numerous daily record highs, and also some monthly record highs expected in parts of the heat-weary South and Plains states.
Numerous daily record highs were broken Sunday. Atlanta's record high of 86 degrees was the latest 86-degree day on record there, surpassing the previous date of Oct. 28, 1940. Macon, Georgia, set a new record high by reaching 89 degrees Sunday afternoon. Greenville, North Carolina, also set a new daily record high by topping out at 86 degrees.
Other daily records were set Sunday in Birmingham, Alabama (87 degrees), Montgomery, Alabama (89 degrees), Tuscaloosa, Alabama (88 degrees), Washington D.C.'s Dulles Airport (84 degrees), Allentown, Pennsylvania (80 degrees), Reading, Pennsylvania (83 degrees), and Islip, New York (77 degrees).

Current Temperatures
Some southern cities could set a new daily record high each day through midweek.
This continues what has been a much warmer-than-average month for the vast majority of Americans east of the Rockies, including a mid-October warm spell that shattered records.
Below are details on the forecast temperatures through Wednesday, along with perspective on how warm it has been so far this month.
(MORE: U.S. Warm Records Trouncing Cold Records)

Monday's Forecast (Halloween)


Forecast Highs Compared to Average Monday
  • Highs 10 to 25 degrees above average will surge back into the Upper Midwest and western Great Lakes, while continuing to encompass much of the Plains and South.
  • 70s are possible as far north as South Dakota, Illinois and Iowa.
  • 80s will once again rule the central Plains, mid-Mississippi Valley and South.
  • A few 90s are possible in the central and southern Plains, as well as the Deep South.
  • Record highs will likely be numerous from the central Plains into the Southeast, making it the warmest Halloween on record in some locations.
  • Potential daily record highs (record to beat is shown): Atlanta (85 degrees); Little Rock, Arkansas (86 degrees); Tulsa, Oklahoma (87 degrees)
(MORE: Halloween Forecast)

Tuesday's Forecast


Forecast Highs Compared to Average Tuesday
  • Highs 10 to 25 degrees above average will surge back into the Ohio Valley and Appalachians, while continuing to encompass much of the Plains, South and Upper Midwest.
  • 70s are possible as far north as Lower Michigan and western Pennsylvania.
  • 80s will once again rule the Ohio Valley, central and southern Plains and South.
  • A few 90s are possible in the Deep South.
  • Record highs will again likely be numerous from the Southeast to the Ohio Valley, threatening some all-time November record highs in some areas.
  • Potential all-time November record highs (record to beat is shown): Amarillo, Texas (87 degrees); Cincinnati, Ohio (81 degrees); Louisville, Kentucky (84 degrees); Nashville, Tennessee (85 degrees)
(MORE: La Nina May Limit Drought Relief in the South This Winter)

Wednesday's Forecast

  • Highs more than 10 degrees above average will spread into parts of the Northeast, while also continuing in much of the Midwest and South. Portions of the Ohio Valley and southern Great Lakes will be more than 20 degrees above average.
  • 70s are expected in the southern Great Lakes, Ohio Valley and mid-Atlantic.
  • 80s will dominate the Southeast, though it won't be quite as warm as previous days.
  • Daily record highs will be within reach in parts of the South and Ohio Valley.

Heat Wave Recap

Thursday, Phoenix smashed their record latest-in-season 100-degree high by four days.
Sorry everyone, we've hit 100 (so far).

Other record highs were tied or set Thursday in Denver (83 degrees), Salt Lake City (78 degrees) and Tucson, Arizona (97 degrees).
Friday, October 28, record highs were shattered in Garden City, Kansas (91 degrees - old record was 83), and Dodge City, Kansas (92 degrees - old record was 85) and new records were set in Amarillo, Texas (87 degrees), Pueblo, Colorado (87 degrees) and Meridian, Mississippi (89 degrees).
Friday was the fifth daily record high this month in Meridian, and was their hottest temperature so late in the season. Previously, the latest they reached 89 degrees was October 26, 2010. This is their average high on September 8.
Daily record high temperatures were toppled in many cities on Saturday. Among them were Huntsville, Alabama (88 degrees), and Amarillo, Texas (91 degrees), which both saw their warmest temperature so late in the calendar year.
Daily record highs were also set Saturday in Asheville, North Carolina (81 degrees), Blacksburg, Virginia (79 degrees), Nashville, Tennessee (86 degrees), Tupelo, Mississippi (89 degrees), St. Louis, Missouri (86 degrees), and Phoenix, Arizona (96 degrees).

How Warm It's Been

Many locations in the central and eastern United States have already experienced a very warm October.
This includes a large number of locations that will see warmer-than-average temperatures through Halloween. The only exception is the Northeast, where it will be near or even slightly below average through Halloween.
Temperatures compared to average Oct. 1-24, 2016. Areas shaded orange and brown have seen temperatures the farthest above average overall.
(Oregon State University Prism Climate Group)
Here are a few of the cities that were seeing a top five warmest October through Friday, according to the Southeast Regional Climate Center.
Record warmest October-to-date:
  • Dallas
  • El Paso, Texas
  • Huntsville, Alabama
  • Lubbock, Texas (tied)
  • Midland, Texas
  • New Orleans
  • Tucson, Arizona
Second warmest October-to-date:
  • Brownsville, Texas (tie)
  • Colorado Springs
  • Houston (Hobby Airport) 
According to NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information, among reporting stations with at least a 30-year period of record, there have been roughly 10 daily record highs tied or broken for every record low so far in October, through Oct. 27.
Daily and Monthly U.S. Warm, Cold Records Tied or Broken in October 2016
Through Oct. 27 (Source: NOAA/NCEI)
 Daily RecordsMonthly Records
Warm4,861150
Cold4826
In fact, through Oct. 27, it's been a record hot year-to-date in several Southeast cities.

MORE: America's 50 Hottest Winter Cities

More Soaking Rain, Mountain Snow Headed to California; Record Wet October in Parts of Oregon, Washington

Linda Lam
Published: October 30,2016

The latest in a series of storms to hit the West Coast during the past week is pushing through parts of California, Oregon and Washington. This will add to what has already been one of the wettest Octobers on record in the Northwest.

Current Radar
Let's take a closer look at the forecast the next few days before delving into the many notables of this wet pattern and what it may mean for the drought.

Wet Forecast Timeline

Below is a rough timeline for the series of Pacific systems and where they are expected to spread rain and mountain snow.
  • Through Sunday Night: A somewhat stronger and wetter storm will continue to impact California and Oregon (rain, mountain snow, some thunderstorms also possible). Some rain and high-mountain snow will also impact Washington, Nevada, northern Utah and Idaho.
  • Monday: A weaker system should bring some additional rain to northern California, Oregon and Washington.
  • Mid-late week: One, if not more, Pacific storms will target the West Coast, perhaps with the heaviest rain farther north than this past week's systems.
(MAPS: Weekly Planner)

Five Day Forecast
The heaviest total rainfall through Monday is likely to be over northern California and southwestern Oregon, particularly the coastal ranges and slopes of the Siskiyous and Sierra below snow level, where up to 3 inches of additional rainfall is possible in some areas.
Less than an inch of rain is possible in parts of the Bay Area and Sacramento Valley.
(FORECAST: Los Angeles | Portland, Oregon | Seattle)
In the Sierra Nevada, up to a foot of snow may fall in the highest elevations. Snow levels will be around 6,000 feet through Sunday night.

Rainfall and Snowfall Forecast

Drought Improvement

A series of low pressure systems brought much-needed rainfall to the Pacific Northwest early in the month. Damaging winds were also observed in Oregon and Washington the weekend of Oct. 15.
The drought monitor released on Oct. 20 showed, for the first time since early June, a small part of California that isn't analyzed as even abnormally dry, in the far northwest corner of the state. In fact, 8.96 percent of the state is not experiencing at least abnormally dry conditions as of Oct. 25, which is the most since March 2013.
Drought conditions across the West as of October 25, 2016 (data from droughtmonitor.unl.edu).
Through Saturday, it was the second wettest October-to-date in Sacramento, second wettest October-to-date in Blue Canyon, California, and second wettest October-to-date in Eureka, California, according to the Southeast Regional Climate Center and the National Weather Service.
However, the area that needs to see rain and snow the most remains central and southern California. Portions of Southern California, including Los Angeles, did receive some rainfall in recent days.

A Record Wet October in the Northwest

There also was huge improvement in Oregon and Washington as well.
The drought monitor report for Oct. 11 showed 84.46 percent of Washington seeing at least abnormally dry conditions and, as of Oct. 25, less than a tenth (0.1) percent was still experiencing dry conditions.
(MORE: Is Seattle's Rainy Reputation Deserved?)
Seattle topped their record-wet October on Saturday, besting the previous record from 2003. Olympia and Hoquaim, Washington, have also seen their wettest October.
On average, Seattle sees about 5 days per year with an inch or more of rainfall and, from Oct. 13 through Oct. 26, they had seen 4 days with at least an inch of rain.
Other parts of Washington and Oregon are also flirting with their record-wettest Octobers. Through Oct. 28, Portland, Oregon; Salem, Oregon; Eugene, Oregon, and Astoria, Oregon, Seattle (@NWSSeattle) <a href="https://twitter.com/NWSSeattle/status/792417917140815872">October 29, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>" target="_blank">had their wettest or second wettest Octobers-to-date.
On Oct. 11, the entire state of Oregon was experiencing dry conditions and, as of Oct. 25, almost half of the state, toward the coast, is now currently free of abnormally dry conditions. However, sections of central and eastern Oregon still need more rain to ease the drought.

Recap of Pacific Storms Last Week

On Monday, the first Pacific storm along with a separate upper-air disturbance soaked parts of Northern California and the Northwest, and brought a flare-up of thunderstorms to Southern California and the Desert Southwest.
Parts of the high country of Southern California picked up 1 to 2 inches of rain from Saturday evening through Monday evening. Over 3,400 lightning flashes were detected over Southern California Monday. Barstow, California, saw its first measurable rainfall since April 30, its fourth longest dry streak (175 days) on record, according to the National Weather Service in Las Vegas.
A second storm impacted the Northwest on Wednesday, bringing over an inch of rain to Seattle.
The latest system in this wet pattern pushed into California and the Great Basin late Thursday night, tapping some high-level moisture from former Hurricane Seymour, which has now fizzled out.
Parts of southwest Oregon had picked up over 5 inches of rain in 48 hours ending early Friday morning. Many locations in the Bay Area picked up 1 to 2 inches of rain, triggering a few areas of local flooding and rockslides. A brief band of heavy rain over the Rey Fire Burn Area in Santa Barbara County, California, triggered flash flood warnings. Even parts of northern Nevada picked up over an inch of rain.
MORE: California Fires, September 2016 (PHOTOS)

An Investigation of Death Valley’s 134°F World Temperature Record

By: Christopher C. Burt , 7:06PM,GMT on October 24,2016



 
An Investigation of Death Valley’s 134°F (56.7°C) World Air Temperature Record

In 2012 the WMO (World Meteorological Organization) disallowed what had long been considered the hottest air temperature ever measured on Earth: a 58.0°C (136.4°F) reading measured at El Azizia, Libya on September 13, 1922. As a result of this record being struck from the books, the temperature of 134°F (56.7°C) recorded at Greenland Ranch at Furnace Creek in Death Valley, California on July 10, 1913 became, by default, the new world’s hottest air temperature yet measured. In this guest blog we will investigate the credibility of that measurement. This blog is courtesy of William T. Reid, a geographer and climatologist who has been studying the desert climate of California and, in particular, the Death Valley temperature record for some 30 years. Mr. Reid and I worked together to come to a commensurate conclusion regarding the validity of this significant planetary weather record: It is possible to demonstrate that a temperature of 134°F in Death Valley on July 10, 1913, was essentially not possible from a meteorological perspective, using an officially sanctioned USWB shelter and thermometer and following proper procedures observationally. Thus, the best explanation for the record high report(s) in July 1913 is observer error.

The Setting

Death Valley is the lowest, driest and, during the summer months, hottest location in the United States. At its lowest spot, Badwater Basin, the altitude stands at 282 feet below sea level. Some 15 miles north of Badwater and about 100 feet higher is the Furnace Creek oasis and resort. A weather station was established here under the aegis of The USWB (U.S. Weather Bureau) in June 1911, and named ‘Greenland Ranch’. The ranch was developed by the William Tell Coleman Borax Company in 1883, and was named such for the alfalfa fields planted for the mule teams used to transport borax and for feed for other ranch animals consumed by the miners, ranch hands and visitors. In 1934, the oasis area became more commonly known as ‘Furnace Creek Ranch’ and Death Valley became a National Monument. The U.S. Park Service established a weather station in 1934 at their Cow Creek headquarters, three miles north of Furnace Creek. Both Cow Creek and Greenland Ranch stations closed in 1961 when the Park Service set up a new cooperative weather station, again under the aegis of the USWB, at the Death Valley National Park Visitors Center where it remains to this day. This new station, named ‘Death Valley’, is approximately 1000 feet (300 meters) north of the former Greenland Ranch.



A photo of Death Valley from Dante’s View shows the Badwater Basin just below (white area) and the Furnace Creek Ranch and the national park visitors area to the north where the green-shaded area is visible in the top right portion of this image. Photo is a still from the documentary film ‘Dead Heat’ produced by Weather Underground in 2012.

The focus of this investigation is the unprecedented temperature record of July 7-14, 1913 when the USWB COOP observer at Greenland Ranch, Oscar Denton, measured a string of abnormally hot days. Maximum temperatures for July 7-14, 1913, were: 127°, 128°, 129°, 134°, 129°, 130°, 131°, and 127°F respectively. Minimums were near-to-slightly above average for this 8-day period, ranging from 85°F to 93°F. Each daily maximum temperature from July 7 to July 14, 1913 equaled or exceeded all other maximum temperature values at Greenland Ranch for the entire 50-year period of record (1911-1961), aside from a questionable maximum of 129°F in July 1960.



Above is a copy of the actual original COOP form supplied to the USWB by Oscar Denton. Many ‘cleaned up’ copies of this have appeared in other articles concerning the Greenland Ranch record. In fact, a small controversy surrounds this. See for more about the issue concerning the provenance of the original COOP form.

The Instrumentation and its Exposure in 1913

The location for the instrument shelter (a standard Stevenson screen), first installed by the U.S. Weather Bureau in 1911 at Greenland Ranch, was “carefully selected” according to George H. Willson (see Monthly Weather Review, June 1915). Mr. Willson was, at that time, the district forecaster and section director for the U.S Weather Bureau (USWB), Department of Agriculture, San Francisco station and was responsible for climate data in Death Valley during its early years. The shelter housed standard USWB maximum and minimum thermometers, and was well exposed to wind. Structures and trees at the ranch were of sufficient distance to disallow any very localized build-up of hot air around the station during bright sunshine. It was placed “over an alfalfa sod”, and “the location is such that the shelter is not exposed to the reflected heat from the desert.” Willson “italicized” the above quote for emphasis. Willson continued:

“Evaporation is excessive in this section and liberal irrigation is necessary to maintain plant life; hence, the cooling by evaporation from the surrounding damp ground and live vegetation is probably sufficient to lower the readings of the instruments several degrees. Undoubtedly the temperature down in the desert bottom of the valley is much higher than it is at Greenland Ranch.”

About 100 acres of land here was irrigated for the alfalfa crop and other fruits and vegetables. Willson made it clear that the new station was in a spot that was cooler, perhaps significantly cooler, than the rest of the basin bottom. This conservative siting (with regard to daytime temperature measurement) might not have been welcome by one of the earliest Greenland Ranch COOP observers, Oscar Denton (and may have influenced his observations). In a Historic Resource Study by Linda Greene (1981, see references) it is stated that by the late 19th century temperatures at the ranch “ranged from eight to ten degrees cooler than elsewhere in the valley due to the presence of water, shade trees, and grass in the area.”

Thermometer shelters were routinely placed above grass during the first part of the 20th century, even in extremely arid areas where grass was scarce. It was thought important to have consistent environments around and below the shelters to allow valid and meaningful temperature comparisons from station to station. It goes without saying but needs to be emphasized: a desert weather station above grass is representative of a desert area above grass, and it is not representative of a desert area above a typical, mostly barren, desert surface.





Two photos of the Greenland Ranch USWB weather shelter taken sometime in the early 1920s or perhaps late 1910s. The first image (top) is the oldest known photograph of the weather station (circa late 1910s to as late as 1921) and is looking west. The other photo (bottom) was taken in March 1924 and is looking north. Photos from the NWS Las Vegas archives.

An image of the Greenland Ranch weather station from the 1920s shows the instruments above bare ground. It is not known exactly when the change occurred from “over an alfalfa sod” to “over bare ground” but it seems likely that the shelter was still above the well-irrigated alfalfa field during the summer of 1913. Shelter maximums during July 1913 would have been approximately two-to-three degrees cooler compared to a shelter above bare ground and far from any irrigated areas. The weather stations in and around Furnace Creek have been above bare ground since at least the 1920s. The highest officially observed temperatures since 1913 have been several readings of 129°F (53.9°C). These were observed on July 18, 1960 at the Greenland Ranch location (questionable veracity), and also on July 17, 1998, July 20, 2005, July 7, 2007, and June 30, 2013 at the Death Valley (NP Visitors Center) location. Photographic evidence indicates the actual maximum on this latter date attained 129.2°F. See photo below.



A photograph of the official Death Valley maximum thermometer at time of observation on Monday morning July 1, 2013. The photo shows a maximum of 129.2°F was achieved on June 30th, perhaps the highest temperature ever credibly observed on Earth. A similar reading from Mitribah, Kuwait in July 2016 has yet to be confirmed by the WMO (U.N. World Meteorological Organization). Photo courtesy of Death Valley National Park and NWS-Las Vegas.

Meteorology of Summer Heat Waves in the Death Valley Region

At near 36°N latitude, Death Valley is ideally situated geographically for hot weather during the summer months. At this latitude, subsiding air and clear skies dominate (associated with the northern fringe of the planet’s Hadley cell), and the vast majority of summer days are clear or mostly clear in Death Valley. During the late spring and early summer the jet stream and the associated ‘westerlies’ migrate poleward. With this cooler mid-tropospheric flow shunted well to the north, warm air is allowed to build aloft over the Desert Southwest and the Death Valley region. From June to August monsoon-related moisture and thunderstorms are common in the Desert Southwest, sometimes impacting Death Valley. This weather regime is associated with lower maximum temperatures due to cloudiness, precipitation, and general evaporative effects such as storm outflow. However, Death Valley is far enough north and west to avoid most of the monsoon activity that migrates from the Sonoran Desert. Because of the prevailing subsidence, coupled with the high terrain on all sides of Death Valley, it is difficult for low-level moisture to reach the depression itself. Normally, any low-level moisture mixes out into the drier upper levels of the atmosphere during daytime convection. The high mountain ranges to the west, especially the Sierra Nevada and Panamint Range, effectively cast a cool-season (October-April) ‘rain-shadow’ over Death Valley, so Pacific storm systems usually sweep through with little more than wind and clouds. On average, the basin of Death Valley receives only 2.0”-2.5” inches of rain annually, with less than an inch on average due to monsoon and tropical-related activity from May through September.

Death Valley’s barren surface is typically bone dry in summer, and it warms easily under the high desert sun. Surface temperatures of 200°F have been measured, as was the case on July 15, 1972 when the ground surface temperature reached 201°F; at the same time the shelter air temperature stood at 128°F. Since little solar radiation is utilized for evaporation and transpiration, nearly all ‘incoming’ solar radiation (that is not reflected skyward) heats the ground. Intense daytime heating of the surface creates a relatively hot, near-ground layer of air characterized by very steep lapse rates (a ‘super-adiabatic’ layer). This creates a very unstable environment and a strong vertical exchange of air is required to mitigate and regulate such. By early afternoon any vestiges of overnight cooling have ‘mixed out’ entirely, and there is deep mixing throughout the lower half of the troposphere throughout the region. Above the near-ground ‘super-adiabatic’ layer, the environmental lapse rate is at (or very near) the dry adiabatic lapse rate of 5.4°F per 1000 feet. The unconditionally unstable, deep, mixed layer typically extends up to about the 600-millibar level (about 15,000 feet above the bottom of Death Valley) on nearly every summer afternoon.

A consequence of the deep, mixed layer is a virtual connection between its top and its bottom. Once established and maintained, the entire column warms (or cools) as an entity. Any significant increase in ambient temperature at shelter level (1.5 meters above the ground) would be, and must be, associated with a similar degree of warming of the entire air column. Thus, the temperature typically changes little at desert stations during the hottest hours of the afternoon. Arnold Court, an expert desert climatologist for the U.S. Army in the 1940s (see references), found that shelter temperatures remained within 2 or 3 degrees (F°) of the maximum temperature from about 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. in Death Valley on July afternoons. The physics of the deep, mixed layer does not allow for the development of area-wide ‘hot spots’ within a region, and it does not allow significant afternoon temperature ‘spikes’ to occur. What it DOES allow is a fairly predictable pattern of temperature in the desert both diurnally and spatially. It promotes a strong correlation, on a regional scale, between daily maximum temperature and elevation.

Llewelyn Williams, a geographer with U.S. Army Natick Laboratories, examined the conditions favoring high surface temperatures at Yuma, Arizona, and determined that the key to high ambient air temperatures is “warm air between 5,000 and 14,000 feet and a well-developed vertical exchange induced during afternoon convection” (1967). The study also found that “there exists an upper limit to what the combination of radiation and ground surface temperature can do in developing high ambient air temperatures”.



This sample sounding from Las Vegas, Nevada (from August 2016) nicely illustrates the typical change in temperature with height in the Desert Southwest on dry summer afternoons. Note that the environmental lapse rate closely approximates the dry adiabatic lapse rate up to the 600-millibar level. Sounding from NWS-Las Vegas.

Williams’ concept of an “upper limit” for maximum temperature applies to all of the Desert Southwest during the summer, including Death Valley. The lapse rate of the deep, mixed layer cannot physically get any steeper above any sunbaked and shallow near-surface layer. Thus the “upper limit” shelter temperature is governed by air temperature thousands of feet above the surface and not by local surface level weather conditions. There are, for all intents and purposes, no small-scale weather features that could cause a significant increase in temperature on a local scale once the atmosphere has mixed out. Of course, there are a myriad of possible local differences in wind, exposure, ventilation, nearby vegetation, terrain, ground cover, and aspect that will cause some small variance in maximum temperatures at any particular place on any particular day. However, these effects are minimized at well-sited weather stations.

The hottest afternoons of summer in Death Valley (and the surrounding region) occur when the air is hottest between about the 850 and 600-millibar levels (5,000-15,000 feet). The upper-level anticyclones (or ‘upper highs’) that are responsible for the hottest weather cover vast areas, and are associated with weak horizontal temperature gradients. Thus, each station in a region is essentially working on the same air mass with regard to maximum temperature potential. The days (and the summers) beneath the strongest upper highs and the warmest temperatures between altitudes of about 5,000 feet and 15,000 feet are the days (and the summers) that are hottest at shelter level. In addition, all stations are affected similarly with regard to departure-from-normal for maximum temperatures because of the broad and homogenous nature of the air mass that is affecting the region.

It is the temperature of the free air thousands of feet above Death Valley that determines just how hot an afternoon at shelter level can become.

When under the influence of such homogenous and well-mixed air masses associated with upper high-pressure domes, all regional weather stations easily attain their ‘upper limit’ temperature on summer afternoons. It is elevation that essentially determines the difference in the maximum temperature between one site and another. These temperature differences are remarkably consistent in the Death Valley region on a day-to-day basis. On occasion, clouds and cooling due to moisture and storms might disrupt the consistency of the regional temperature-elevation relationship (by not permitting some areas to reach their ‘upper-limit’ maximum temperature), but these instances are relatively infrequent in midsummer.

Thus, not surprisingly, for the Death Valley region, there is a strong correlation when plotting station elevations versus:

1) average daily maximum temperatures for summer months

2) average annual maximum temperatures

3) extreme maximum temperatures of record

4) day-to-day maximum temperatures during the hottest summertime periods

Note that summer maximums in the region change with elevation at a rate close to 4.5 degrees F per 1000 feet, a rate not quite as steep as the dry adiabatic lapse rate of 5.4 degrees F per 1000 feet.




The physical characteristics of the atmosphere above the Death Valley region on typical, warm-to-hot and sunny summer afternoons are such that temperature differences from station to station are due almost entirely to elevation differences, and the rate of change with elevation is consistent. Under the influence of a mid-level anticyclone, the departures from average for maximums are generally very similar region-wide. In summer, if the lower-to-mid-troposphere is warm enough to allow only near-normal maximums in the region, then it is not warm enough to cause MUCH-above-normal maximums at ANY location in the region. Heat waves are never localized in summer. Maximum temperatures are quite predictable and are dependent on temperatures between about 5,000 and 15,000 feet. The hottest events are associated with temperatures of about 17°C to 19°C at the 700 mb level. The average and extreme temperature data in the table above are for each station's period of record that varies from site to site. NOTE ABOUT THE TABLE AND GRAPH ABOVE: Problematic and questionable reports, such as the maximums from 128°F to 134°F at Greenland Ranch in 1913 and 1960, were excluded. Also not incorporated in the averages and extremes are data from periods when a station appeared to be inadequately sited (albeit temporarily) and was providing unrepresentative maximums compared to its long-term record. Graphics by William T. Reid.

Comparison of Temperatures at Death Valley to Locations in the Vicinity

There are a number of ways to illustrate how anomalous the Greenland Ranch temperature reports of July 1913 were from a climatological and statistical perspective, for instance:

—-Dr. Arnold Court (“How Hot Is Death Valley?” see references) was skeptical of the record of 134°F as early as 1949, determining that a value that high would be expected statistically only once every 650 years based on the first 37 annual maximums at Greenland Ranch.

—-The diurnal temperature ranges were exceptionally large for July during the first two weeks of July 1913.

—- All annual maximums at Greenland Ranch (1911-1960) were 120°-127°F (aside from 1913 and a suspect 129° in 1960), and all at the Death Valley location (1961-2016) were 119°-129°F. The combined average (of 105 annual maximums) is 124.3°F and the standard deviation of such is 2.2. An annual maximum of 134°F would be a full 4.5 standard deviations from the mean.

The best way to ‘question’ the record maximums of July 7-14, 1913, however, might be to demonstrate that such extremely hot conditions were essentially not possible physically at that time. Based on the surrounding station data, the atmosphere above the Death Valley region was not warm enough to allow authentic maximums near and above 130°F at Greenland Ranch during the second week of July 1913. As mentioned earlier, summertime heat events here are characterized by a strong correlation between elevation and maximum temperature, and are characterized by relatively similar ‘departures from average’ for the maximums at stations in the region. During hot weather, the maximum temperatures at any selected station tend to be very well supported by the maximum temperatures attained at ALL of the surrounding stations. Of course, this is assuming that all of the temperature measurements are valid. This section compares several heat episodes to the one of July 1913.

The nearest (long term) stations to Greenland Ranch with temperature data during its early years of operation were as follows:

To the WEST: Lone Pine and Independence in Owens Valley of California near 3900’ feet in elevation.

To the SOUTH and SOUTHEAST: Barstow, CA and Las Vegas, NV near 2000’.

To the NORTH: Tonopah and Columbia (near Goldfield), Nevada near 6000’.

All the above sites are 75 to 115 miles distant from Greenland Ranch (the weather stations at Independence and Tonopah employed U.S. Weather Bureau observers). The elevation-versus-temperature charts provided in this section include a sloping ‘average lapse rate’ line through each plot for Greenland Ranch. Its slope of 4.5 degrees F per 1000 feet closely approximates the average change of daily maximum temperature with elevation in the region during Julys. Despite the distances involved, if dry and sunny weather prevails AND the data are problem-free, then all stations should plot relatively closely to the average lapse rate line through Greenland Ranch. For that matter, ALL stations should plot relatively closely to a line with the same slope through ANY station plot.



A map illustrating all of the sites mentioned in this blog. Map courtesy of Mark Stroud at Moon Street Cartography.

Summers of 1911 and 1912

Local environments and instrumentation at the regional weather stations were presumably much the same in the summers of 1911 and 1912 as they were for 1913. Comparisons of reliable maximums during the summers of 1911 and 1912 should provide a fairly solid foundation for expected differences between stations in subsequent summers.

In its first two summers of record, (1911 and 1912), Greenland Ranch maximum temperatures were supported by those observed at surrounding stations (Table A and July 1911 plot). The departures from average for the maximums are relatively consistent among the stations during the warmest periods. For the hottest 13-day period in July, 1911 (July 5-17), for example, average maximums ranged from 0.2°F above the July average at Lone Pine to 3.2°F above average at Barstow. Greenland Ranch maximums averaged 1.9°F above average based on its 1911-1930 average of 116.4°F as per the Climatic Summary of the United States, USWB, 1933. The relatively narrow range of departure values among the stations is commonplace, and to be expected during the hotter-than-normal periods in mid-summer. Similarly narrow spreads of departures were the case for the hottest periods during the summer of 1912.

The temperature-elevation plots for the same 13-day period in July 1911 show that four of the five stations plot a few degrees to the left of the average maximum-temperature-versus-elevation line through Greenland Ranch. This might suggest only modest support for the Greenland Ranch maximums, but Columbia plots slightly to the right of the line, offering excellent support. Lone Pine and Independence, in Owens Valley, are both about 6°F off the line on the cool side. Owens Valley was much moister than Death Valley prior to water diversions to Los Angeles that began in 1913. It is not surprising that differences in maximum temperature between the two basins in summer were a bit wider than that which would be expected due only to elevation differences. The different times of observation (5 p.m. at Greenland Ranch and midnight at Independence) would also produce slightly larger differences in average maximums between the two stations.



This plot (for the period of July 5-17, 1911) illustrates fairly consistent support for the Greenland Ranch maximum temperature of 122°F during the July heat wave of 1911 vis-a-vis the other sites reporting temperature data those weeks. Compare this to the 1913 graph several paragraphs below. Graphs produced by William T. Reid.

Daily maximums for June, July, and August for both 1911 and 1912 averaged 23 degrees lower at Independence and 32 degrees lower at Tonopah compared to Greenland Ranch. These differences in average daily maximum temperature are quite reasonable for stations separated by 4185 feet and 6268 feet of elevation, respectively.

The Summer of 1913

An inexplicable change in the correlations and differences mentioned above developed during the spring and early summer of 1913. Greenland Ranch maximums increased to levels not supported by surrounding data (see Table A and charts). For June, July, and August of 1913, maximums at Greenland Ranch averaged 28 and 36 degrees F warmer than at Independence and Tonopah, respectively. This is an increase of four-to-five degrees compared to the differences during the summers of 1911 and 1912. Similar, wider-than-normal differences in average maximums were evident in April and May of 1913 as well.

For the first 15 days of July 1913, the average maximum of 125.7°F at Greenland Ranch was 9.3 degrees F above its average daily maximum temperature for the usual July (Table A and charts). The surrounding stations were generally 2.5 to 4.5 degrees F above average, so the maximums at Greenland Ranch were running about 6 degrees F warmer, over and above the typical differences, than the surrounding sites. The Greenland Ranch maximums depict an unprecedented two-week period of extremely hot weather, while the other stations show a heat wave which might be characterized as ‘better-than-average’ but certainly not ‘extreme’.

The differences are even wider for the hottest 5-day period in July 1913: from the 9th to the 13th. Greenland Ranch maximums averaged 30.4 degrees F higher than Independence and 41.6 degrees F higher than at Tonopah. The table below shows average maximums and departures for July 9th to July 13th:



For the monthly maximums in July 1913, Greenland Ranch's 134°F is 18 degrees F above the July average max temperature, compared to departures of only +7 to +11 degrees F at the nearest stations:



The maximums at surrounding stations would suggest, or support, a daily extreme maximum of about 123°-126°F at Greenland Ranch during the heat wave of July 9-13. Authentic temperatures near and above 130°F in Death Valley are not supported by any of the maximums at the closest stations.

Looking at the station-elevation plots, the surrounding stations fall well to the left of the average temperature-elevation/lapse-rate lines through Greenland Ranch for both the 15-day period of July 1913 and for the extreme daily maximum during the period. If it is presumed that the lower troposphere was very well-mixed in the Death Valley region; and if it is presumed that the maximum temperature data are reliable at the stations surrounding Greenland Ranch; and if it is presumed that the instrumentation at Greenland Ranch was problem-free and in the same place as it was during the summers of 1911 and 1912; then it is difficult to explain the very hot observations at Greenland Ranch during the first half of July 1913, at least from a physical or meteorological perspective.



Compare this to the graph from July of 1911 reproduced several paragraphs above.

Greenland Ranch maximums are a bit more reasonable for the hot period of August 1-8, 1913 (Table A and chart further below in blog), but still seem a bit warmer than what the surrounding stations would support. The hottest periods in 1915 and 1916 show a similar pattern (though not as pronounced as in July 1913), with maximums at Greenland Ranch averaging a few degrees on the high side.

Annual Absolute Temperature Maximums: Summers of 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914, and 1915

At the stations that surrounded Greenland Ranch, the heat wave of July 1913 saw extreme temperature maximums that were near or a few degrees warmer than those of the previous two years (1911 and 1912). In 1913, however, Greenland Ranch jumped up more than ten degrees hotter compared to what was observed there in 1911 and 1912.

Here are the annual maximums (with departure from the July average daily maximum in parentheses) for 1911 through 1915:



NOTE: Oasis Ranch and Lida had too short a period of record to establish mean temperatures. They are included in the above table because they were among the closest sites to Greenland Ranch that were active during this period. (see map).

Although long-term stations near Death Valley saw hotter absolute maximum temperatures in numerous summers compared to 1913, Greenland Ranch never again came close to its record of 134°F observed on July 10, 1913.

Significant Heat Events Post-1913

Here is a summary of some significant heat events in Death Valley in later years, and how the temperatures in Death Valley compared to other sites in the vicinity:

July 16-28, 1931

The last half of July 1931, was especially hot at all of the stations in the Death Valley region. For the 13-day period from July 16 to 28, Greenland Ranch maximums averaged 122.3°F, or about six degrees above its July daily average. Similarly, maximums at the surrounding stations were 6 to 9 degrees above average (Table A and plot). The hottest days at each station were around the 19th and again on the 26th, when Greenland Ranch reported 126°F. In fact, on July 26th Las Vegas reported its highest temperature ever observed: 118°F. A strong correlation during this heat event is evident when the average maximums are plotted against station elevation, and also when the highest temperature for the period is plotted versus elevation.



Again, compare this plot to that of July 1913 earlier in the blog.

July 11-29, 1933

An impressive heat wave gripped the Death Valley region this month. For the 19 days from the 11th to the 29th, Greenland Ranch maximums averaged 123.2°F, nearly seven degrees hotter than its average daily maximum for July. Departures at surrounding stations were similar: +5.9 at Las Vegas, +6.7 at Trona, +7.8 at Independence and Tonopah, and +7.9 degrees at Goldfield. This heat wave was greater in length and intensity than the July 1913 event at Independence, Las Vegas, and Tonopah; yet at Greenland Ranch the maximum of 127°F in July 1933 was well short of its 134°F in 1913.

July 1972 and June/July 2013

The Death Valley weather station (now sited near the National Park Visitors Center) reached impressive maximums of 128°F in mid-July, 1972 and 129°F in late June 2013 (see charts). Maximums at surrounding stations during these heat waves were also near or at record levels, providing support for the reports from Death Valley. Plots of averages and extremes for numerous other notable heat events in the region can be found here. For each event (outside of the period while Denton was the observer) the correlation between temperature maximums and elevation is strong: surrounding stations support the Death Valley maximums and the Death Valley maximums in turn support those at the higher elevation sites.

Data Tables

Below (2nd table down) are listed the average maximum temperatures and the associated ‘departures from the average daily maximum for July’ for the station at Greenland Ranch compared to other sites in the region during the hottest summertime periods from 1911 to 1960.

The departures are based against averages for the stations’ period of record through 1930, if available:



TABLE A

Table A compares departures from average in maximum temperature between Greenland Ranch/Furnace Creek Ranch and surrounding stations for selected significant summertime hot spells in the region.

The first figure for each period is for Greenland Ranch, and is the difference between its average maximum (for the period shown) and its long-term average maximum temperature for July (116.4°F) for the POR of 1911-1930 (*see note below concerning this).

The second figure is the average of the departures of the maximums (compared to July data) at the surrounding stations, namely Independence, Lone Pine, Tonopah, Columbia/Goldfield, Las Vegas, Barstow, Trona and Cow Creek.

The third figure is the difference between the first two values. During typical summertime heat waves, departures in maximum temperature are roughly similar among all of the stations. The difference in departures between Greenland Ranch and the average of the closest stations should usually be close to zero. When the difference is more than a few degrees from zero, as during several of the summers when Oscar Denton was observer at Greenland Ranch, then that suggests problematic or suspect data at Greenland Ranch.

*NOTE: A value of 116.4F is utilized in this table as the average daily maximum temperature for July at Greenland Ranch. This is the figure provided in Summary of the Climatological Data for the United States, by Sections, Weather Bureau Bulletin W, 1912, revised and reprinted in 1933.. This value incorporates the 20 Julys at Greenland Ranch from 1911 to 1930, and is likely artificially inflated by about one degree F because of the suspect maximum temperature reports during the period when Oscar Denton was the observer (for the summers of 1913-1920). The Western Region Climate Center gives a figure of 115.5°F as the average July maximum temperature at Greenland Ranch for the POR (period of record) from 1911 to 1960. Also, note that the data below are relative to averages for July, including the non-July timeframes shown for the summer of 1913 (in order to illustrate the anomalously high temperatures during Oscar Denton’s first summer as the COOP observer).



The actual data for the above figures can be found here.

The USWB COOP Observer at Death Valley in 1913

About September 1912, Oscar Denton replaced Thomas Osborne as the Greenland Ranch USWB COOP weather station observer. Denton, of San Diego, began signing the USWB COOP forms in September, but the first form with data in his handwriting was December 1912. Denton served as the observer, caretaker, and foreman of the ranch for the Pacific Coast Borax Company until mid-August, 1920. Thus, Denton’s first full summer as the weather observer was the summer of 1913. A meticulous examination of the Greenland Ranch climate record during the eight years with Denton as observer reveals an abundance of curious and problematic reports:

—-When rain fell at the ranch, recorded amounts were almost invariably in the amounts of 0.01”, 0.10”, 0.20”, and 0.30”.

—-Minimum temperatures were consistently, and inexplicably much too warm during the winters of 1913-14 and 1914-15. This resulted in unusually small diurnal temperature ranges. The temperature reports during these two winters suggest a striking lack of familiarity with the instruments and/or the standard operating procedures by the weather observer.

—-There were occasional periods when the daily maximum and minimum temperatures would take on a persistent and rather unnatural numerical pattern. These periods would often show poor correspondence in temperature between Greenland Ranch and surrounding stations. As one example, in September 1914, there were 15 consecutive maximums of either 109°F or 110°F (and surrounding stations offer no support to the run of nearly identical maximums). These instances suggest that Denton may have been just ‘filling in the blanks’ for days when he missed taking the observations.

—-When Denton was providing the ‘set max’ temperature at the 5 p.m. observation time, the maximum temperature on the following day was occasionally lower than the ‘set max’ entry provided on the previous day at 5 p.m. This implies that Denton was resetting the maximum thermometer more than once per day, presumably to know the ‘real’ maximum for the day in question rather than for the entire previous 24 hours.

For the period of record when Oscar Denton was observer at Greenland Ranch it is important to emphasize just how problematic the climate record for Greenland Ranch became. Here is a good example: For the period from March 16-20, 1913 a warm spell in the Desert Southwest came to a quick end when a cool and windy weather system swept into California and Nevada. A few stations in the Death Valley region reported small amounts of rain around the 18th, and observer notes mentioned very windy conditions on the 17th and 18th at Columbia, Barstow and Las Vegas. Maximum temperatures fell region-wide by about ten degrees from the 17th to the 18th, yet the maximum at Greenland Ranch on both days was constant at 90°F. Although there was generally little change in maximum temperature from the 18th to the 19th at the closest surrounding stations, the maximum at Greenland Ranch jumped up to 95°F on the 19th. Independence had a high of only 56°F on the 19th, and Barstow reached only 62°F. The increase in the maximum temperatures at Greenland Ranch during this cooling trend strongly suggests that Denton was, perhaps, absent from the ranch and that he estimated the temperatures for the time he was gone. There were no missing days on the COOP forms during Denton’s tenure. Perhaps Denton decided that estimated temperatures were better than blank spaces on the COOP forms. See this link for more on data inconsistencies and problems at Greenland Ranch during the Denton years of observation.



A photograph of Oscar Denton appeared in the magazine ‘Popular Science Monthly’ for their September 1922 edition. It is perhaps the only known photograph of Mr. Denton. Another image (below) in the same article shows an unidentified man, possibly Denton, at the weather shelter. Photos from Popular Science Monthly September 1922 issue (see references).



Was Denton adequately capable and competent to provide reliable data? His supervisor, Fred Corkhill, said that Denton had difficulty reading the tables to determine the humidity from the wet and dry bulb readings in order to properly set the hygrograph. It would appear that Mr. Denton was not scientifically inclined. Was Denton adequately conscientious and motivated to provide reliable climate data? The Greenland Ranch record from 1912 to 1920 would suggest not much. However, it may be that Denton was overly preoccupied with his weather observing duties, and somewhat obsessed with temperature readings at the ranch (especially during the torrid summer months when the ranch and borax works pretty much shut down and Denton was often the only person there). His penchant for resetting the maximum thermometer more than once per day, for entering figures for periods when he was absent, for entering temperatures which appear blatantly false (and on a somewhat regular basis), show that Denton's mindset may have been affecting the observations he entered into the COOP forms.

There is little doubt that Denton enjoyed sharing the stories of intense heat and personal survival in Death Valley with visitors and other employees who rarely visited or worked at the ranch during the summer months. Writer Frank Crampton (see references) had this to say about Denton:

“It was not often that more than one or two of the old timers, prospectors, or desert rats were at the Furnace Creek Ranch at the same time, but Oscar was a good listener, and he passed the latest stories and the best lies to the next to come for the regular cleanup and supplies.”

Denton was likely proud that he was one of the few who could tolerate the heat of Death Valley and survive an entire summer (let alone many) there as caretaker. If, as the old-timers related, the temperature at the ranch would sometimes soar into the 130°s and 140°s, then his stories of surviving the hottest summer days when the temperature hit ‘only’ 125°F at the official weather station might have fallen a little flat.

Conclusions

1) Greenland Ranch temperatures not consistent with meteorological conditions in July 1913

The temperatures reported at Greenland Ranch during the period of hot weather from July 7-14, 1913 were not consistent with meteorological conditions in the region at the time of observation. There is no indication that an exceptional heat wave was occurring in the Southwest U.S. during this period. ‘Isolated hot spots’, whether a result of wind patterns or local geography, cannot account for the exceptional temperatures reported at Greenland Ranch given known meteorology of Death Valley during extreme heat events.

As a footnote to this, it is interesting to quote Mr. George H. Willson (who first reported the record in the Monthly Weather Review for June 1915): “The daily weather maps have been carefully studied for some peculiarity that would explain the extremely hot weather in Death Valley in July 1913, but it is doubtful if a sufficient cause was found. The weather type was that which always causes high temperatures over the south Pacific coast district, it was not unusually pronounced, and did not give record temperatures in any other portion of California.” He went on to say, “The condition was probably local as is often the case in mountainous regions, and the exceptionally high temperatures were confined to Death Valley”. We now know that this could not have been the case, since no heat event in Death Valley has ever, in over 100 years of observation, confirmed such a possibility.

2) Lack of correspondence with surrounding weather sites at time of July 1913 observations

The extreme temperature of 134°F measured on July 10, 1913 did not correlate with observations at other sites in the region on this date and likewise for the entire period of the extreme temperature readings reported from Greenland Ranch during the week of July 7-14, 1913. During several other periods during the time that Oscar Denton was the observer at Greenland Ranch temperatures were often, although not always, at odds with the surrounding site observations. Given the maximums at the surrounding stations in July 1913, the atmosphere was never hot enough to support authentic air temperatures as high as 134°F at Furnace Creek in Death Valley.

3) Concerns with observer’s credibility and experience

Since the record hot observations at Greenland Ranch from July 7-14, 1913 cannot be explained meteorologically, it is the conclusion of this investigation that the observer, Oscar Denton, knowingly or inadvertently exaggerated the maximum temperatures during that time frame. This likely was the result of his lack of experience as an official USWB observer coupled with a strong notion that the temperature readings from the USWB instrument shelter, above the cooling influence of the irrigated alfalfa sod, were inadequate. Given the much higher temperatures indicated on other household thermometers at the ranch, Mr. Denton may have been of the opinion that the ‘official’ Stevenson screen observations were not accurately representing the extreme heat which he felt was self-evident. The heat wave in July 1913 was the first such he was ‘in charge of’ as an official COOP observer and perhaps he was not familiar with temperature measurement in a controlled environment i.e. an official USWB-supplied Stevenson Screen and the official equipment (thermometers) that accompany such. Thus he fell back on what he perceived to be his own experience of Death Valley heat and associated temperatures and he consequently exaggerated the temperatures indicated on the maximum thermometer to values he thought were more realistic.

The Greenland Ranch weather station was sited in a very conservative place, a relatively cool place in Death Valley. If the observations of 129°F to 134°F at Greenland Ranch from July 9 to 13 were authentic, then maximums at the closest surrounding stations during that 5-day period would have been substantially hotter than actually observed.

Finally, it is not possible to conclusively prove that Mr. Denton intentionally or inadvertently exaggerated his observations. However, it is possible to demonstrate that a temperature of 134°F in Death Valley on July 10, 1913 was essentially not possible from a meteorological perspective using an officially sanctioned USWB shelter and thermometer and following proper procedures observationally. Thus, the best explanation for the record high report(s) in July 1913 is observer error.


References/Bibliography

Court, Arnold, 1949: How Hot is Death Valley? Geographical Review, vol. 39, pp. 214–220.

——, 1952: Duration of Very Hot Temperatures Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 33, pp. 140–149.

——, 1953: Temperature Extremes in the United States Geographical Review, vol. 43, pp. 39–49.

Crampton, F. A., 1956: Deep Enough: A Working Stiff in the Western Mine Camps University of Oklahoma Press.

Eklund, Ernest E., 1933: Some Additional Facts about the Climate of Death Valley, California. Monthly Weather Review. Vol. 61, pp. 33–35.

Greene, L. W., 1981: Death Valley National Monument, Historic Resource Study, A History of Mining, Volume I Parts 1 and 2 Historic Preservation Branch, Pacific Northwest/Western Team, Denver Service Center, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Denver, Colorado.

Harrington, Mark W., 1892: Notes on the Climate and Meteorology of Death Valley, California Weather Bureau Bulletin No. 1, U.S. Weather Bureau.

Hogg, J. E., September, 1922: Welcome to the Hottest Spot on Earth!"Popular Science Monthly, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 19-22.

Ludlum, David, 1963: Death Valley Weatherwise, June 1963, pp. 116-117.

McAdie, A. G., 1913: Relative Humidity in Death Valley Monthly Weather Review, vol. 41, p. 931.

Palmer, Andrew, January 1922: Death Valley -- The Hottest Known Region Monthly Weather Review, Volume 50, pp. 10-13.

Potter, Sean, Jul/Aug 2010: Retrospect: July 10, 1913: Highest Temperature Ever Recorded in North America Weatherwise Magazine, Vol. 63, No. 4, p. 14.

Reid, William T., 1987: A Critical Analysis of Eastern Mojave Desert Temperatures. Masters Thesis, California State University Northridge, Geography Department (376 pages).

Roof, Steven and Callagan, Charlie, 2003: The Climate of Death Valley Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 84, No.12, pp. 1725-1739.

Stachelski, Chris, 2013: World's Hottest -- 100th Anniversary of the World's Hottest Recorded Air Temperature. pages 6-7 of PDF document on this Death Valley National Park web site link.

Stachelski, Chris, and Las Vegas NWS Staff, last updated 2016: Climate of Death Valley, California online PDF document from NWS Las Vegas.

Willson, George H., 1915: The Hottest Region in the United States Monthly Weather Review, vol. 43, pp. 278–280, 341.

Williams, Llewelyn, 1967: Climatological Conditions Favoring Occurrence of High Temperatures at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona Technical Report 67-42-ES, U.S. Army Natick Laboratories, Earth Science Division, Geography Branch, Natick, Massachusetts.


About William T. Reid

William T. Reid studied Geography and Climatology at California State University Northridge. Reid received a B.A. and M.A. in Geography/Climatology from CSUN in 1981 and 1987, respectively. His Masters Thesis, "A Critical Analysis of Eastern Mojave Desert Temperatures," was under the advisement of Dr. Arnold Court and included a detailed scrutiny of the record 134°F report at Greenland Ranch in 1913. Reid has worked as a climatologist and forecaster for a private weather company in Southern California, and has worked as a certified weather observer at several airports in the Los Angeles area since 2004. He currently operates and oversees automatic cooperative weather stations in Chatsworth and at his home in Westlake Village for NWS Oxnard. Reid has studied temperature records in the California deserts and Death Valley region for more than 30 years, culminating with a detailed write-up on his web site that focuses on Greenland Ranch's early temperature record (a work in progress).

KUDOS: Big thanks to Mark Stroud of Moon Street Cartography for production of maps and tables.


Christopher C. Burt
Weather Underground